|
Discussion Topics 1. The biggest difference between the myth and Pygmalion might be found in the idea of transformation of the statue(Galatea): while the statue became a human being, a beautiful woman, and an ideal lover(and a wife), Eliza was transformed into a lady of upper class English accents. What other things was she changed into, that were not really intended or anticipated by Henry Higgins? A real upper class lady: by what is a real lady made? family background, money, education, accent, profession?
An independent woman: a self-awareness that one is a human-being of a certain dignity regardless of race, class, and gender. Could the changed Eliza called such a person?
2. Bernard Shaw's intention in his adaptation seems to be a social satire. What do you think was the main target of his satire?
The middle(upper) class snobbery? Who were the target of satire? Was Henry Higgins also satirized?
3. Was Eliza's rebellion successful? In what way?
4. Is there any hint of Henry Higgins's sincere self-recognition of his own fault? Is there any possibility for a real romance between the two? Or was he an incorrigible hypocrite who denies his own natural affection(or desire) for Eliza?
 
|
